For teams that just lost Productiv.

What we are offering

25% off your first-year platform fee. For verified former Productiv customers, through October 31, 2026. We will ask to see a Productiv contract or invoice, which is the only verification step. Year-two pricing is the standard rate and we will put that number in front of you before you sign, because springing a renewal increase on you would be a strange way for us to behave.

A written data portability commitment. You can export your full dataset at any time in open formats, and we are contractually obligated to return your data if you leave. We are putting that in writing because you have just learned exactly why it matters, and because a promise that only exists on a marketing page is worth nothing.

Free renewal triage for your next two quarters. Before any purchase decision. We will work through what is committed, what the notice windows are, and where you have exposure in the next 180 days. If that conversation tells you that you do not need us yet, we will say so.

Three paths out of this, and most teams will use more than one

The instinct right now is to find the closest thing to what you had and buy it. That is one option and for some teams it is the right one, but it is worth knowing there are three, because the answer is usually a mix.

Rebuild the visibility. Replace what Productiv did: inventory, spend, owners, renewals, and usage evidence, reconstructed from systems you already control. This is the fastest route back to a working baseline and it is the right first move if you have renewals inside the next two quarters.

Build some of it in-house. This is newly viable in a way it simply was not two years ago. Internal teams using AI coding tools are now building working replacements for simple commercial applications in weeks, and for a certain class of tool that is genuinely the cheaper answer. The bottleneck has moved, though. It is no longer whether your team can build the thing. It is knowing which applications are worth building, which are not, and having criteria you can defend when an app owner disagrees. Very few organizations have anyone whose job is to answer that question.

Consolidate away the need. Sometimes the right answer is neither replace nor build. It is folding a capability into something you already pay for. This sounds like the easy option and it is usually the hardest of the three, because merging two tools into one is a stakeholder and change management problem rather than a technical one. It fails on the people, not the migration script.

Whichever mix you land on, the part that decides whether it actually happens is the move itself: reports, integrations, historical data, and users have to get from the old thing to the new thing. This is where switching decisions quietly die, and it is why incumbents get renewed by default even when a better option is obvious. Identifying what to build is the new bottleneck, and moving off what you are leaving is the part nobody budgets for. Those are the two problems we spend most of our time on.

Why we think we are a reasonable choice right now

Productiv's distinguishing capability was engagement data pulled through vendor integrations. That was genuinely useful and it was structurally fragile, because it depended on software vendors continuing to expose the usage data that helps their customers argue for smaller contracts. Vendors have been restricting that access for a while. We were already talking to Productiv customers who were evaluating a move for that reason, before any of this happened.

Most of the replacements being recommended to you this month work the same way. We do not. We work from contracts, spend, and entitlement records, which are things you own and control. We compare tools by what they actually do rather than what category they sit in, which is what makes an overlap recommendation survive the app owner pushing back on it. Pricing comparisons come from real contract data rather than list prices.

There is no implementation project. The first useful output lands in days, which matters when you have a renewal in three weeks.

What happens if you get in touch

You will talk to me, not to a sales development rep. The first conversation is about what you are actually walking into: what is renewing, what you have lost, and what you need to decide in the next quarter. If we are not the right fit for that, I will tell you and point you somewhere better.